Stanford GSB: Tips on Writing Exceptional MBA Essays

Applying to Stanford GSB this year? Some great tips from their Dean’s Corner.

My favorite bit: “Differentiation is a byproduct, rather than a goal, of the essay (and the entire admission process).”

Cheers,

Janson

Ivy Eyes Editing

***

We rarely are asked to think deeply about what is most important to us. Stanford professor Bill Damon’s book The Moral Advantage: How to Succeed in Business by Doing the Right Thing contained the following passages that might help you as you write your essays.

“We are not always aware of the forces that ultimately move us. While focusing on the “how” questions—how to survive, how to get ahead, how to make a name for ourselves—often we forget the “why” questions that are more essential for finding and staying on the best course: Why pursue this objective? Why behave in this manner? Why aspire to this kind of life? Why become this type of person?

These “why” questions help us realize our highest aspirations and our truest interests. To answer these questions well, we must decide what matters most to us, what we will be able to contribute to in our careers, what are the right (as opposed to the wrong) ways of behaving as we aim toward this end, and, ultimately, what kind of persons we want to become.

Because everyone, everywhere, wants to live an admirable life, a life of consequence, the “why” questions cannot be ignored for long without great peril to one’s personal stability and enduring success. It is like ignoring the rudder on a ship—no matter how much you look after all the boat’s other moving parts, you may end up lost at sea.”

Essay Philosophy

The Stanford MBA Program essays provide you an opportunity to reflect on your own “truest interests” and “highest aspirations.” While the letters of reference provided by your recommenders are stories about you told by others, the essays are stories told by you. Please think of the Stanford essays as conversations on paper. When we read your file we want to get a genuine sense of you, which means that you need to tell us your story in an authentic and natural way.

Our goal in reading your essays is to understand what motivates you and how you have become the person you are. We’re also interested in what kind of person the Stanford experience can help you become.

Reflective, insightful essays help us envision the individual behind all of the experiences and accomplishments that we read about elsewhere in your application—the who behind the what. The self-awareness that enables you to write your essays also will allow you to succeed and grow at Stanford, so that you may serve organizations that change the world.

Essay 1: What matters most to you, and why?

In the first essay, tell a story that only you can tell. Most essays address the what through descriptions of people, events, and situations in your life. The best essays emphasize the why, showing how and why these whats have influenced you. It is not solely an experience, but also your reaction to it, that defines you. While many candidates base your stories on a similar what, the why allows each of you to tell a story that only you can tell.

The most common mistake applicants make is spending too much time describing the what and not enough time describing how and why these guiding forces have shaped your behavior, choices, attitudes, and objectives. What matters most to you and why? is a personal topic that requires a personal response. As such, please be assured that we appreciate and reward thoughtful self-assessment and appropriate levels of self-disclosure.

Essay 2: What are your career aspirations? What do you need to learn at Stanford to achieve them?

Please note that this question comprises two separate but related questions. Answer both.

First, we ask you to describe your career aspirations. What are your ideas for your best self after Stanford? What kind of impact do you hope to make in your professional life after Stanford? We consciously moved away from asking you about your short-term and long-term goals because we really do not believe you know (or even need to know) that level of detail to succeed in the admission process. Though we give you broad license to envisage your future, you may find it difficult to explain why you need an MBA to achieve your aspirations if the aspirations themselves are undefined. Be honest, with yourself and with us, in addressing those questions. You do not need to fabricate a path if you don’t have one, but a certain level of focused interests will enable you to make the most of the Stanford experience.

Then, we ask what you need to learn at Stanford to achieve these aspirations. How do you plan to take advantage of the opportunities at Stanford? How do you see yourself contributing, growing, and learning here at the GSB? And how will the Stanford experience help you become the person you described in the first part of Essay 2?

You should have objectives for your Stanford experience, whether personal, intellectual, or professional. The implication is that there is a gap between who you are today and the aspirations you’ve set—otherwise, you would just go out and fulfill your dreams today. So you need to tell us how the Stanford experience will help you bridge that gap. There are a number of truly amazing business schools, and we humbly count ourselves among them, but Stanford may not be the right school for every candidate. So ask yourself how Stanford can help you—through knowledge, experiences, insights, relationships, skills, or anything else you imagine.

From both parts of Essay 2, we learn about your dreams, what has shaped them, and how Stanford can help you bring them into fruition.

Essay 3: Short Answers

Unlike the two essay topics, these questions require you to reflect on recent experiences. You must share insights on an experience that occurred within the last three years.

The best answers will transport us to that moment in time by painting a vivid picture not only of what you did, but also of how you did it. Include details about what you did, felt, said, and thought during that time, along with your perceptions about how others responded. From these short-answer responses, we get a sense of you in action.

Essay Tips

Moving beyond the essay and short-answer questions, I’d like to offer some guidance.

Tip #1: Answer the question.

My best advice for writing effective essays is the simplest advice: answer the question asked. This may sound like superfluous advice. How can a thoughtful applicant spend hours writing essays but not answer the question? It happens frequently.

I suspect it happens like this: you believe that, for Stanford to admit you, we must know about a particular experience (or a certain set of accomplishments). As you write, your primary goal shifts to finding a way to highlight that experience…whether or not it is the best answer to the question asked. In short, you have just lost track of answering the question. When this happens, it’s clear to the reader, and it rarely strengthens an application.

Tip #2: Don’t try to stand out.

Yes, each of you is unique. Yes, differentiation is essential in the admission process. But no, you should not aim to stand out. Bear with me on this…

Differentiation is a byproduct, rather than a goal, of the essay (and the entire admission process). This is a distinction that I often make when I’m talking with applicants at admission events, so you’ve likely heard this from me if you’ve attended a recent information session. Think of it this way: if you focus on standing out, you often have the opposite effect. How does this happen?

Well, when you focus on standing out, you may believe that you need to have accomplishments or feats that are unusual or different from your peers (e.g., traveling to an exotic place or talking about a tragic situation in your life). But how are you to know which of your experiences is unique when you know neither the backgrounds of the other applicants nor the topics they have chosen? What makes you unique is not that you have had these experiences, but rather how and why your perspective has changed or been reinforced as a result of those and other everyday experiences.

That is a story that only you can tell. If you concentrate your efforts on telling us who you are, differentiation will occur naturally; if your goal is to appear “unique,” you actually may appear more like other people who also are trying to stand out.

Truly, the most impressive essays that we read each year do not begin with the goal of impressing us. I often say that most Stanford MBAs have excelled by doing ordinary things extraordinarily well. I think this applies to essays, as well.

Advice #3: Focus on substance, not style.

When we read great novels, we depend on the author’s storytelling skills to engage our imagination. We parse the carefully crafted sentences and delight in the choice of words, tone, and cadence.

When we read your essays, however, we read for content. That means you need not worry about every single word choice, as if your reader is Michiko Kakutani: after all, you are applying to a school of management, not creative writing. We expect a carefully crafted composition. We expect correct grammar and clear reasoning. You do not need to worry about a dramatic opening scene or about a sentence that serves as transition between your essay topics. Worry about your argument. Worry about authenticity.

The essays are important. But they are neither our only avenue of understanding you, nor are they disproportionately influential in the admission process. Please be assured that we will admit you despite your essays if we feel we’ve gotten a good sense of you overall from other aspects of the application.

Tip #4: Accounting Versus Marketing

Alumnus Leo Linbeck, MBA ’94 told me something on an alumni panel in Houston a few years ago that I have since appropriated.

Leo said that, in management terms, the Stanford essays are not a marketing exercise; they are an accounting exercise.

This is not an undertaking in which you look at an audience/customer (i.e., the Committee on Admissions) and then write what you believe we want to hear. It is quite the opposite. This is a process in which you look inside yourself and try to express clearly what is there. We are trying to get a good sense of your perspectives, your thoughts on management and leadership, and how Stanford can help you realize your goals.

Conclusion

Once you have completed the business school application process, I am confident that you will feel that you benefitted from an opportunity for structured reflection—regardless of the outcome of the admission process. I hope that you will approach the application process as a way to learn about yourself—that’s the goal—with the byproduct being the application that you submit to us.

As Professor Damon would say, we are helping you ensure that your rudder steers you to the right port. (That sentence would not be necessary in your essays. ☺)

Derrick Bolton, MBA 1998
Assistant Dean for MBA Admissions

Transferring Schools? Transfer Essay Tips from Ivy Eyes Editing

Hello everyone,

This admissions season, some of you may be considering transferring to a college or program that better aligns with your needs.This is among the most challenging of admissions goals, because the odds are simply not in your favor. To this end, we wanted to share some excellent tips for writing transfer essays:

1. Develop a Nuanced, Well-Supported Case

Did you develop interests at your first college that can be explored more fully at the new school? Does the new college have a curriculum or institutional approach to teaching that you find particularly appealing? If you can replace the name of one college with another, your essay must be refined and made more specific–the best transfer essays only work for one college.

2. Take Responsibility for Your Grades and What You Have (or Haven’t) Done

Many transfer students have lapses in academic performance. Some students will have unique situations that are appropriate justification for a transcript blemish. However, for the rest of you–take responsibility for your grades and, if necessary, contextualize the lapse, and explain how you plan to improve your performance at your new school. The admissions committee will be much more impressed by the mature applicant who owns up to failure than the one who fails to take responsibility for his or her performance.

3. Don’t Slander Your Current College

Diplomacy is key. Rather than complain about how poor your professors or college environment has been, focus on how your current college does not meet your needs. The admissions officers are looking for enthusiastic, optimistic applicants who will make a positive contribution to their campus community.

4. Polish Style and Tone

The best transfer essays should convey a certain level of sophistication. Many transfer applicants apply to schools they may not have been accepted to before–so your goal is to use the transfer essay to show growth, and total readiness to ‘hit the ground running’ at your new program.

5. Avoid Supporting Your Case with the Wrong Reasons

You must present reasons for transferring that are grounded in the meaningful academic and non-academic opportunities. ‘World-class faculty and phenomenal architecture’ do not cut it. In some very select cases, transfer reasons can be of the personal variety, but they should also be anchored with other concrete support.

6. Create a Well-Rounded Brand

What have you done at your current school? Always keep your essay positive. You want to show that you’ve made the most of every offering at XXX school–but you’ve grown as much as you can possibly grow, and utilized all existing resources. Focus on highlighting transferable leadership skills, extracurricular capabilities, and of course, academic niche or contributions.

Hopefully these tips will help many of you as you refine your transfer essay. With delicate positioning and strategy, you can successfully transfer to your dream program. As always, feel free to message us here with specific questions, or email us for a critique of your transfer essay!

Sincerely,

Ivy Eyes Editing

www.ivyeyesediting.com

Entrepreneur Alert: Harvard’s Minimum Viable Product Fund

Hi everyone,

Harvard recently announced a new program that will bankroll HBS students’ entrepreneurial ventures. Read below for more details from boston.com. Many of our MBA clients with entrepreneurial interests frequently feel as though traditional MBA programs do not equip them with the platform to cultivate or nurture their ideas; this program may be a perfect fit.

Sincerely,
Ivy Eyes Editing
www.ivyeyesediting.com
***

Harvard Business School unveiled a program today that will help support student entrepreneurs in getting their new products quickly to market.

The program is called the Minimum Viable Product Fund, or the MVP Fund, and it is an initiative of the school’s Arthur Rock Center for Entrepreneurship; it aims to allocate awards of generally $5,000 each to 10 student teams.

The program is partly based on a concept called “Lean Startup methodology, which focuses on rapid prototyping, a process that brings products to market as quickly as possible,” the Harvard Business School said in a press release.

The release included a statement from first-year MBA student Dan Rumennik, who along with fellow students Jess Bloomgarden and Andrew Rosenthal proposed the idea.

“For entrepreneurially-minded students at HBS, this fund alleviates the financial barrier preventing them from building initial prototypes or test products,” Rumennik said. “This is the greatest challenge for people with an idea but no money. It also encourages students to start businesses while in school and to connect with more of their peers who want to do so as well. Finally, it’s a great opportunity for students to get experience managing a product as they go about the process of creating a business.”

The Top Five: Harvard, Stanford, Chicago, Wharton & Dartmouth

Hi everyone,

Below are the MBA program rankings from Poets and Quants. Their comprehensive methodology blends rankings from BusinessWeek, U.S. News & World Report, Financial Times, Forbes, and The Economist.

A great reference for those of you applying to MBA programs this year and next.

Cheers,

Ivy Eyes Editing

www.ivyeyesediting.com

***

There are significant and telling flaws in every MBA ranking, no matter where it comes from or how it is put together. The vast disparities in rank across the major rankings shows that where a school ranks is more a function of the methodology than any overall indication of quality. That’s why we carefully studied the pros and cons of each ranking, weighted each of them based on their authority and credibility, and then used all of those inputs to come up with our own ranking.

The beauty of this methodology is that each of the five major MBA rankings—BusinessWeek, U.S. News & World Report, Financial Times, Forbes, and The Economist—are brought together for the very first time. By blending these rankings using a system that takes into account each of their strengths as well as their flaws, we’ve come up with what is arguably the best and most reliable ranking of MBA programs ever published. This composite index also naturally accommodates some of the wild disparities that you find from one survey to the next. Consider the University of California’s excellent Anderson School of Management. The Economist ranks it 50th, well behind L.A. rival the University of Southern California and the University of Notre Dame. The Financial Times puts UCLA at 33rd. BusinessWeek rates it 14th, U.S. News at 15th, and Forbes at 19th. Those are some pretty big differences of opinion on UCLA’s Anderson School. We think it’s the 16th best school in the U.S., a rank that is the sum total of all of them, adjusted for the authority we believe the major rankings have.

Harvard, Stanford, Chicago, Wharton and Dartmouth Rank At the Top

To some long-time watchers of MBA education, there may be little surprise at seeing the Harvard Business School and Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business at the very top as No. 1 and No. 2. The most influential ranking by BusinessWeek, however, has never had either Harvard or Stanford in the top spot. Through 11 rankings over 22 years, BusinessWeek has awarded that accolade to Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management five times, to the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School four times, and to the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business twice. In the global MBA rankings published by The Financial Times, last ranked Harvard first back in 2005. Since then, Harvard has lost out to Wharton (four times in a row) and to London Business School (in the current 2010 FT ranking). The highest rank Stanford has ever achieved in The Financial Times ranking is third and that was four years ago in 2007.

But the power of this newest ranking by Poets&Quants is that it awards consistency across the various surveys, eliminates the greatest anomalies in any one ranking, and takes advantage of the largest amount of qualitative and quantitative data ever compiled in a single study of the best business schools. One problem we could not overcome: it was impossible to make this a true global ranking because BusinessWeek and Forbes separate international schools (with Forbes carving up the overseas market into one-year MBA programs and two-year MBA programs), U.S. News doesn’t rate any non-U.S. institutions, and the Financial Times and The Economist mix them. The lack of standardization across the surveys prevents a fair and credible blending of non-U.S. schools. However, it is possible to rank the non-U.S. schools separately, and that’s what we did.

Differences in Rank Can Be Statistically Insignificant

Unlike the majority of rankings, we also give you our index numbers, which gives you an understanding of how far ahead or behind one school is over another. In many cases, the differences are so slim that they are statistically insignificant, yet most of the organizations that rank schools hide this data from you. So you can see that Wharton at an index number of 95.6 is only 1.2 percentage points behind Chicago in this ranking. Showing you index numbers provides you with the analytical context to better make decisions on which schools to apply to and which schools to say yes when accepted. The index numbers reveal where the statistical differences are so slim as to matter very little. Also, don’t assume that if one school has an index number twice as large as another that it is twice as good. It may be, or it may not be. The difference between No. 1 Harvard, which tops the index at 100, and No. 20 Indiana University, which has an index number of 47.9, is obviously far greater than two-to-one.

P&Q Rank & School Index BW Forbes News FT Econ
1.  Harvard Business School 100.0 2 3 1 3 5
2.  Stanford School of Business 97.8 6 1 1 4 7
3.  Chicago (Booth) 96.8 1 4 5 9 4
4.  Pennsylvania (Wharton) 95.6 4 5 5 2 9
5.  Dartmouth College (Tuck) 89.0 12 2 7 14 6
6.  Columbia University 88.0 7 6 9 6 20
7.  Northwestern (Kellogg) 87.5 3 8 4 22 15
8.  MIT (Sloan) 84.9 9 14 3 8 19
9.  California-Berkeley (Haas) 80.0 10 12 7 28 3
10. New York (Stern) 77.9 13 17 9 13 13
11. Duke (Fuqua) 75.9 8 13 14 20 28
12. Michigan (Ross) 73.9 5 18 12 28 25
13. Virginia (Darden) 70.5 16 9 13 31 24
14. Cornell (Johnson) 69.7 11 7 18 36 32
15. Yale School of Management 69.0 24 10 11 16 27
16. California-L.A. (Anderson) 60.1 14 19 15 33 50
17. Carnegie-Mellon University 57.2 19 23 16 34 33
18. North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler) 55.5 17 15 21 46 39
19. Texas-Austin (McCombs) 53.9 21 11 16 52 49
20. Indiana-Bloomington (Kelley) 47.9 15 25 23 57 46
21. Emory (Goizueta) 46.5 23 22 27 34 52
22. Brigham Young (Marriott) 44.6 22 16 33 83 NR
23. Southern California (Marshall) 41.8 25 32 20 57 36
24. Georgetown (McDonough) 40.9 NR 31 24 38 48
25. Notre Dame (Mendoza) 37.5 20 38 31 71 34
26. Washington U. (Olin) 33.0 28 41 19 50 65
27. Maryland-College Park (Smith) 31.8 26 29 45 43 51
28. U. Washington (Foster) 31.7 27 40 33 78 31
29. Southern Methodist (Cox) 30.8 18 33 49 96 88
30. Vanderbilt (Owen) 29.6 30 30 36 57 64
31. Minnesota (Carlson) 28.4 ST 26 24 75 62
32. Georgia Institute of Technology 27.2 29 44 26 NR NR
33. University of Iowa (Tippie) 24.3 ST 20 42 64 61
34. Ohio State (Fisher) 24.2 ST 39 21 67 45
35. Michigan State (Broad) 22.3 ST 21 46 65 NR
36. Rochester (Simon) 22.0 ST 37 27 48 NR
37. Texas A&M (Mays) 21.0 NR 24 33 54 NR
38. Univ. of Connecticut (Storrs) 17.4 ST 27 79 NR NR
39. Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison 17.1 NR 35 27 67 54
40. Boston University 16.3 ST 61 31 61 40
41. Purdue (Krannert) 13.9 ST 45 36 54 NR
42. Arizona State (Carey) 13.8 ST 56 27 89 NR
43. Penn State (Smeal) 12.9 NR 28 48 NR 58
44. Univ. of California-Irvine 10.7 ST 58 36 72 NR
45. Wake Forest (Babcock) 10.6 NR 34 46 NR 77
46. Rice University (Jones) 10.4 NR 47 39 44 77
47. Boston College (Carroll) 8.4 NR 46 39 47 NR
48. Illinois–Urbana Champaign 8.3 ST 63 42 52 87
49. Babson College (Olin) 4.6 ST NR 54 99 NR
50. George Washington Univ. 4.3 ST 73 55 57 NR

Footnotes:

NR – Not ranked. Because the Financial Times and The Economist include many non-U.S. schools in their rankings, a larger number of very good MBA programs at U.S. schools remain unranked by those two publications.

ST – Second tier. BusinessWeek ranks the top 30 business schools and then identifies a group of 15 more schools in an unranked “second tier.”

Methodology: Schools on each of the five major rankings were scored from a high of 50 to a low of 1, the numerical rank of the 50th school on any one list. Then, those sums were brought together, weighting the BusinessWeek ranking 30%, the Forbes ranking 25%, the U.S. News & World Report rankings 20%, the Financial Times rankings 15%, and The Economist ranking 10%. These differing weights reflect the authority and credibility we believe each of these rankings have in the business school universe. For a deeper explanation of the strengths and weaknesses of each system, see how we think the most influential rankings stack up against each other. To be included in the Poets&Quants analysis, each school had to receive a ranking from at least three of these most influential lists of the best full-time MBA programs.

Yale Admissions 2010: Results Just In!

Hi everyone,
As many applicants receive their acceptance and rejection letters, an article from the Yale Daily News reports on Yale’s admissions stats as of December 15.
Best,
Ivy Eyes Editing
www.ivyeyesediting.com
***

High school senior blogs about Yale rejection

Friday, December 24, 2010

Avery DiUbaldo is one of 1,497 early applicants who received news that they were denied admission to Yale this month – but DiUbaldo is the only one who blogged about it on the New York Times’ website.

In a series entitled “The Choice: Demystifying College Admissions and Aid,” six high schools seniors from Cherry Creek High School in Denver, Colo. are blogging about their college searches, and DiUbaldo chose his rejection from Yale as his most recent topic to discuss.

In a post entitled “A Decision Letter from Yale, Then a Sandwich and a Nap” DiUbaldo described his unremarkable reaction to receiving the news. Diubaldo wrote that he said “Oh, how about that,” made himself a sandwich, and then took a nap. He also said family and friends reassured him by telling him that “Yale just isn’t right for you anyway. He himself joked:

No matter where you look, the evidence is clear: there is an undeniable correlation between attending Yale University and eventually dying. Who would want to make the Faustian bargain of attending a prestigious college where all the graduates end up dead after 50 years?

Joking aside, DiUbaldo said Yale’s news was not surprising, though he would have attended Yale if given the opportunity. The result of his application to Yale means that DiUbaldo will continue with his college search: in his case, auditioning for a handful of theater programs.

Yale notified 761 applicants of their acceptance Dec. 15, deferring 2,952 to the regular decision round.

Improv in the MBA Classroom

Hi everyone,

A great article (key excerpts below) from BusinessWeek on MIT Sloan’s integration of improv into the MBA classroom. In an increasingly international, multidisciplinary and evolving business landscape, the ability to ‘think on one’s feet’ and even ‘role play’ are critical to business performance.

Business people–like actors–are constantly expected to deliver a flawless performance to win a client engagement, strengthen a brand, or capture a new audience. We expect other MBA programs to follow suit in order to cultivate business people that are not only capable leaders and innovators, but effective communicators as well.

Cheers,

Ivy Eyes Editing

www.ivyeyesediting.com

***

“The second-year MBA students were participating in a leadership class called “Improvisational Leadership: In the Moment Leadership Skills,” according to a release from the Sloan School. The acting class is the latest step by a leading business school to integrate creative arts and drama into the business school curriculum.”

“Most of the business schools I focused on in that story offered acting classes, but the Sloan School (Sloan Full-Time MBA Profile) appears to be one of the first business schools to bring improvisational acting into the classroom. Daena Giardella, a professional actress, director and leadership coach, teaches the class and guides the students through experiential exercises, interactive improvisations and real-life simulations. The financial crisis and shaky economy has heightened the need for this type of training, which brings lessons from psychology and theater to business education…”

“The three-hour, once-a-week class has some readings and two required papers, but the majority of the class grade comes from class participation and scenes and monologues that students are expected to enact on the spot. For example, in one scene a student played a boss who was annoyed with an employee who didn’t respond to e-mails. In another, students banded together to form a corporate team that was frustrated when a member who was planning to leave hadn’t yet told the team leader.”

“MIT’s improv class is yet another example of business schools choosing to pay more attention to the so-called “soft skills” that recruiters say they are looking for in MBA candidates. For example, the Wharton School (Wharton Full-Time MBA Profile) recently announced that it be focusing more attention on oral and written communication in their curriculum overhaul. Other schools have added classes and workshops in public speaking. Sloan is perhaps taking an unusual approach to teaching these skills, but it might be onto something.”

2010 Early Decision and Early Action Results at Yale, Stanford and More

Hi everyone,

Great article from the Washington Post on early decision and early action decisions this past week. Stay tuned and best of luck to all of our clients!

Cheers,

Ivy Eyes Editing

www.ivyeyesediting.com
***

What schools have announced Early Decision or Action?

By Jenna Johnson
Jenna Johnson

This month lots and lots of high school seniors are watching their mailboxes and inboxes, waiting for news of acceptance, deferral or rejection.

Help me compile a list of colleges and universities that have made the big announcement….

MIT: On Thursday, the first 772 students were invited to join the Class of 2015. MIT received 6,405 early action applicants, and those accepted have until May to commit. (Admissions Web site)

Yale: On Wednesday officials announced they had invited 761 students to join the Class of 2015. The school had 5,257 early applicants, denied admission to 1,497 and deferred 2,952 students to the regular decision round. The early action program is non-binding. (Yale Daily News article)

Johns Hopkins: On Wednesday morning, admission officials mailed acceptance letters to 518 students who were selected from a pool of 1,330 early-decision applications. Then, starting at 6 p.m. they hit send on an e-mail alert to all of the applicants. Those accepted are expected to pull all other applications and attend Hopkins. (Hopkins Insider live blog)

Georgetown: Officials announced Wednesday they had accepted 1,120 students from a pool of 6,654 early applicants. The early-action program is non-binding, and students have until May 1 to commit. (Press release)

Duke: On Tuesday evening, officials e-mailed 645 students and welcomed them to the Class of 2015. More than 2,200 students applied to the early decision program this year, and those accepted are expected to enroll. (Duke Chronicle article)

Dartmouth: This week officials announced they had accepted 444 students from a pool of 1,759 early-decision applicants. The deadline for admitted students to declare their intent to enroll is later this month. (Press release)

University of Pennsylvania: Early applicants sat at their computers Friday afternoon waiting to check the admissions website at 3 p.m. Out of a pool of 4,571, the university accepted about 1,195 students. The offer is binding and students are only allowed to apply early to one school. (Daily Penn article)

Stanford: Friday afternoon officials e-mailed more than 5,900 early applicants — 754 were accepted, and about 500 were deferred. Students have until May 1 to accept. (Stanford Daily article)

On Thursday, I hosted an online chat about undergraduate admissions with Greg Roberts, dean of admission at the University of Virginia, and Jill Medina, associate director of admissions for Oberlin College. You can read the transcript from the live chat, here.

Campus Overload is a daily must-read for all college students. Make sure to bookmark http://washingtonpost.com/campus-overload. You can also follow me on Twitter and fan Campus Overload on Facebook

HBS Round 1 Decisions: ISO a New Type of MBA Applicant?

Hi everyone,

Great article from Forbes (via Poets and Quants) on some surprising outcomes from HBS Round 1. Is the HBS candidate ideal shifting? Perhaps a trend to be seen at many top MBA programs around the country, as institutions begin to seek out all types of business leaders, backgrounds, and aspirations. As the MBA–and what it is used for–continues to evolve, we can only assume that the admissions process will as well. For the full article visit here:

http://www.fuqua.duke.edu/programs/duke_mba/daytime/apply_daytime/

All best,

Janson

***

Harvard Biz School to Wall Street: Rejection!

In what may be a marked appeal to diversify its ranks and soften its image, Harvard Business School sent out several surprising rejections and wait list notifications to candidates from some of the most prestigious financial firms in the world.

By John A. Byrne, contributor

(poetsandquants.com) — Several high-performing private equity and financial stars were dumbfounded, outraged, or just perplexed to be rejected or waitlisted when Harvard Business School released its round one decisions on Dec. 14.

Earlier this week, when Harvard notified applicants in its first admissions round whether they would be accepted for its 2013 graduating class, some of the most highly qualified applicants from the worlds of finance and consulting were turned down for admission or put on waitlists.

Sandy Kreisberg, founder of hbsguru.com, and an admissions consultant in Boston, says that, based on his database of clients, which includes more than 50 applicants who were interviewed as part of Harvard Business School’s first admissions round, it was the worst year on record for high-powered private equity and investment banking superstars, especially from powerhouse firms. Those firms often have acceptance rates near 100%, but in the first round, many were below 50%. “It’s a small but obsessively-followed cohort,” said Kreisberg.

A New York-based admissions consultant, who asked not to be identified, with four first round Harvard Business School applicants as clients, all with financial or consulting backgrounds, said that two were rejected outright while another two were put on the waitlist.

If these limited observations prove widespread, it would represent a dramatic shift in the composition of future Harvard Business School. For the class that entered Harvard last year, students with backgrounds in the military, non-profit and healthcare sectors total just 17%. MBAs with work experience as consultants come to 22%, while those with finance backgrounds, including private equity and venture capital, total 32%.

“This move away from powerhouse firms is either a 100-year ‘drought,’ as it were, or the visible hand of new policies hinted at by Dean Nohria in his public remarks,” said Kreisberg. “My bet is the visible hand.”

Just two months ago, Harvard’s new dean Nitin Nohira was making what he thought was an important point about Harvard’s MBA students on a National Public Radio show in Boston.

“People think we only turn out MBAs who become consultants and investment bankers,” said Nohria, “but the reality is that we have people who go to work in social enterprise and in small business. What people want of us are leaders who can contribute to all these different types of organizations in society.”

Tom Ashbrook, the talk show host of WBUR’s On Point, quickly interrupted the dean. “That’s great and it sounds sweet,” he sarcastically told Nohira, “but more than half of your grads go into consulting and finance.” Ashbrook then went on to quote the school’s own career services statistics to prove his point.

Nohria changed the topic.

For admission consultants and others who read Harvard’s tealeaves, the feeling is that Nohria is changing the profile of the traditional HBS class. Several admissions consultants say the new dean appears to be favoring applicants from healthcare, the military, government, and non-profits over those from such financial powerhouses as Goldman Sachs (GS), KKR (KKR), and Blackstone (BX).

The reason: to increase the odds that a higher percentage of future MBAs go into more politically correct fields such as social enterprise, entrepreneurship, and health care, and are more likely to avoid Wall Street.

Deirdre Leopold, Harvard’s director of admissions and financial aid, may have been preparing candidates for the shift when she in an email she sent to candidates who had been interviewed for admission the day before sending out admissions decisions.

“If my job were to rank order candidates from high to low in order of individual strength, whatever that might mean, different decisions might be made,” Leopold wrote.

Asked to comment, Leopold said by email, “Delivering a class with as much diversity as possible — with a common bond of high academic achievement and potential — has always been the promise we make to our students.

“It’s simplistic to assume that the place where young people worked for a few years is the only — or most important — ‘tag’ that they wear in our application process. Speculation notwithstanding, it’s not the way our process works,” Leopold added.

ABC’s Modern Family: Rethinking Tonality & Identity in MBA Essays

Cornell’s Johnson School of Business demands that applicants answer one of the most dreaded essay questions of the season:

Cornell Johnson Essay 3. You are the author for the book of Your Life Story. Please write the Table of Contents for the book. (400 words).

The initial problem with most applicants’ approach is that they take themselves too seriously. Writing what they think an admissions committee wants to hear—the most noble, poised rendering of their life story—they craft a life that you wouldn’t pick up at an airport bookstore, at a deep discount.  So, what makes a life authentic?

Embracing the light and the dark, the good and the bad, the funny and the serious. ABC’s Modern Family perfectly achieves this balance in tonality, making it one of the most refreshing and relatable (despite its oddball cast of characters) shows on television. Compare the following:

These episodes can all be equally high (or low) camp, dramatic, heartwarming, hilarious and absurdist–but the average of these aforementioned characterizations forms an authentic cross-section of real American life. From a tonal point of view, this hybrid mix is a useful barometer for admissions writing, and should remind applicants that your life story can have hilarious moments. Your  life story can have highs AND lows; what’s most important is how your identity shines through them.

Additionally, we all have the eccentric nephew, the crazy aunt, or the trophy stepmother; similarly, most admissions stories have been told before. Your professional or personal endpoint probably doesn’t vastly differ from other applicants. However, it’s up to you to imbue your writing with YOUR distinctive voice (or introduce the trophy stepmother–she is family afterall).

So, when beginning to write your table of contents for Johnson, think about the full spectrum of your life’s major events and goals—and don’t abandon your personality, your indecision or moments of self-doubt or your transitions. These are the elements that make up a truly human, authentic story—and that can separate you from another admissions drone. Embrace your inner weirdo, and luxuriate in your perfection imperfection. We’ll tell you if you’ve gone too far.

Cheers,

Janson

Ivy Eyes Editing

www.ivyeyesediting.com

Tsinghua University–More than Just China’s MIT?

Hi everyone,

A great article just published in BusinessWeek explores the growth behind Tsinghua University. This reminded me of Yale’s President Levin’s speech (delivered last year) on The Rise of Asia’s Universities:

“Today, the later and much larger developing nations of Asia – China and India – have an even more ambitious agenda. Both these emerging powers seek to expand the capacity of their systems of higher education, and China has done so dramatically since 1998. But they also aspire simultaneously to create a limited number of “world class” universities to take their places among the best. This is an audacious agenda, but China, in particular, has the will and resources that make it feasible.”

To this end, the BusinessWeek article reports:

“Tsinghua’s MBA board of advisors amounts to a list of China’s key business players, including the heads of Carlyle, Blackstone (BX) and Temasek. “I sometimes feel like it’s too much,” says Janice Chiao, a first-year international MBA student from Taiwan. “If you’re not motivated and active and out there participating in events every day, you’re going to miss out on tons of opportunities to network and meet interesting people.” The undisputed top science university in the country, Tsinghua is often called “China’s MIT.” So it’s only natural that MIT’s Sloan School of Management (Sloan Full-Time MBA Profile) would be Tsinghua’s main overseas partner.”

Changes are also afoot with the program’s curriculum:

“As the transformation of China’s economy continues, Tsinghua has been forced to grow less dependent on its American partner. Tsinghua just launched a new curriculum in the fall with a heavier focus on what’s relevant in China and more specialty classes developed just for Tsinghua’s international MBA students. One of the more innovative programs is the BMW Global CEO lecture series. BMW (BMW:GR) executives and managers—some flown in from Germany—give weekly lectures over the course of a semester, a valuable opportunity to learn about the world’s largest auto market. “”

Furthermore, Tsinghua is truly beginning to carve out a name for itself as a premiere MBA program:

“With programs like the BMW class, we’re becoming more than just ‘China’s MIT,’” says Ma Jia, MBA admissions director for the school. “Tsinghua has another prime asset: brand. As the top-ranked school in China, Tsinghua’s name means something to just about everyone in the country. “When I asked the heads and managers of the companies I was working with about which program I should go to, people kept telling me Tsinghua,” says Chi-Hoong Kok, an Australian who worked in the cell phone industry for eight years before coming to Tsinghua. Kok, who turned down an offer from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST Full-Time MBA Profile), one of Asia’s top-ranked business schools, is a sign that the brand reaches across borders. Over 45 percent of this year’s international MBA class is foreign-born—one of the biggest contingents of international students of any Chinese MBA program.”

As applicants start to look beyond top programs in the U.S.–seeking out MBA degrees in areas where they might develop their careers–these burgeoning programs should be given close consideration. Not only do they have incredible resources, many of them make perfect strategic sense for specific career paths and skill sets. For more information on Tsinghua’s MBA program, click here.

Cheers,

Janson

Ivy Eyes Editing

www.ivyeyesediting.com